<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Java vs. .NET: Job Market and Salary Survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://javablog.franksalinas.net/2008/11/22/java-vs-net-job-market-and-salary-survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://javablog.franksalinas.net/2008/11/22/java-vs-net-job-market-and-salary-survey/</link>
	<description>Java Enterprise Development &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:21:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yves Guyon</title>
		<link>http://javablog.franksalinas.net/2008/11/22/java-vs-net-job-market-and-salary-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Guyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://javablog.franksalinas.net/?p=102#comment-383</guid>
		<description>Great article....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://javablog.franksalinas.net/2008/11/22/java-vs-net-job-market-and-salary-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://javablog.franksalinas.net/?p=102#comment-344</guid>
		<description>This isnt the whole story.  The reason for the lower demand in .Net is your able to find more resources that work with .Net.  Finding a good Java guy who doesnt want a million dollars (one who can actually keep up with .Net development) is nearly impossible.  .Net simply allows faster development and programmers are able to pick it up faster. Visual Studio is the standard and they all know it. Theres 10 flavors of &quot;Java&quot; and 10 development platforms. Splintering is bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isnt the whole story.  The reason for the lower demand in .Net is your able to find more resources that work with .Net.  Finding a good Java guy who doesnt want a million dollars (one who can actually keep up with .Net development) is nearly impossible.  .Net simply allows faster development and programmers are able to pick it up faster. Visual Studio is the standard and they all know it. Theres 10 flavors of &#8220;Java&#8221; and 10 development platforms. Splintering is bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://javablog.franksalinas.net/2008/11/22/java-vs-net-job-market-and-salary-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://javablog.franksalinas.net/?p=102#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Important to note that this is in San Fran, which is the backyard for Java.  Makes me wonder if .Net would be on top in other cities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Important to note that this is in San Fran, which is the backyard for Java.  Makes me wonder if .Net would be on top in other cities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
